Dear Editor:
I am currently completing my MSN as a community health clinical nurse specialist (CNS). I
wondered when I began this program why there is a need for CNSs and nurse practitioners
(NPs); I mean, why couldn't these two specialties be combined into one? After reading Dr.
Lyon's article, "Why the CNS and NP Roles Should Not Be Blended in a Masters Degree
Program," however, I realize this option would not be feasible.
NPs have a strong clinical focus. This is great because it provides the client with high quality
care at a substantially lower cost than a primary care physician. Community health CNSs,
however, are trained to have a broader community focus, especially with resource management
in these ever financially-constricting times. The diverse focus of this form of CNS and the
primary care focus of an NP would be very difficult to combine into one person. However, I do
see where the collaboration of these two highly specialized but equally valuable forms of
advanced practice nursing should be seamless.
As an example, an NP sees Joe. Joe needs complex care, some of which the NP can provide
but some of which is referred out. The community health CNS can ensure that programs and
systems are available to take over from the referral point to ensure Joe gets the special care he
needs at the best price. The system should work so well that Joe's only concern should be getting
well.
This example shows how having two separate specialties works in the best interest of both
the patient and the payor. This type of treatment requires direct patient care and community
healthcoordination efforts. It is clear to me these two specialties should not be combined but
allowed to work within the system individually and interdependently. Therefore, I agree with Dr.
Lyon's article which states in greater detail the reasons against combining these two advanced
practice nursing specialties.
Pamela A. Assid, RN, BSN, Lt, USAF
Executive Officer, 90th Medical Group
F E Warren AFB WY