Glazer, Greer. (May 4, 1999). NursingWorld | OJIN: Legislative Column: Legislative and Policy Issues Related to Interstate Practice Online Journal of Issues in Nursing Available http://www.nursingworld.org/ojin/tpclg/leg_7.htm

Examination of interstate nursing practice by the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN), the American Nurses Association (ANA), specialty organizations and state legislatures has resulted from three major influences:

1. the rapid growth of the telehealth/telemedicine;
2. the expansion of multistate healthcare systems; and
3. the increased mobility of registered nurses.

Multistate Licensure is not a new concept; it has been discussed for years. The term for the overall goal and approach of multistate licensure is the mutual recognition model for nursing regulation. However, formal policy statements and legislation are recent developments. The NCSBN elevated their 2 year discussion of multistate licensure to a policy issue by approving the concept of implementation of multistate licensure for RNs at the Delegate Assembly in August, 1997. The Nurse Multistate Licensure Mutual Recognition Model was adopted by the NCSBN. A special NCSBN Delegate Assembly met in December, 1997, and approved legislative compact language. The 1998 Delegate Assembly adopted the outcome of implementation of the Mutual Recognition Master Plan and reaffirmed the NCSBN’s commitment to continue dialogue with professional and consumer groups about concerns related to compact language. Utah was the first state to adopt the NCSBN compact language and enacted S.B. 146: Nursing Regulation — Interstate Compact. The act takes effect Jan. 1, 2000. This legislative column hyperlinks to the text of the bill since this bill will likely serve as a prototype for other states. Other states are actively involved in moving multistate licensure forward. Over 20 states attended a NCSBN legislative strategies meeting in the summer of 1998 to help states develop a process to effectively pursue multistate regulation. States expressing an interest in adopting a compact in 1999 or 2000 include: Alaska, Arkansas, Arizona, Delaware, Idaho, Iowa, Massachusetts, Maryland, Mississippi, Minnesota, Montana, Nebraska, North Carolina, New Jersey, Nevada, South Dakota, Texas, Tennessee, Wisconsin and Puerto Rico.

The ANA and National Association of Pediatric Nurse Practitioner Associates and Practitioners, (NAPNAP), separately commissioned legal memorandums related to the NCSBN Compact language. NAPNAP sent a letter detailing their "grave concerns" with the proposed NCSBN multistate licensure compact language to the governors and attorney generals in every state in April, 1998. This column hyperlinks to one such letter. The NCSBN responded to NAPNAP’s letters by sending all of the governors and attorney generals a letter, hyperlinked to this column, to "set the record straight and urge you to support the adoption of the compact in your state", in May 1998.

ANA’s legal analysis of the proposed NCSBN multistate licensure compact was made public in June, 1998. A summary of the legal opinion contains numerous issues. The June, 1998 ANA House of Delegates adopted a resolution dealing with interstate practice which identifies the guiding criteria needed in interstate compacts. The ANA Board of Directors subsequently developed a position statement on the nurse licensure compact in February, 1999, which addresses "grave concerns" about the current Nurse Licensure Compact. Collaboration has occurred during Fall, 1998, and Winter, 1999, between the NCSBN, ANA, specialty organizations, state boards of nursing and state nurses associations to address concerns about the interstate compact language. New language has been proposed related to:

1. release of "current significant investigative information;
2. deletion of immunity to a non governmental entity;
3. extension of authority for states to recoup the costs of investigations and prosecutions. The authority should be sought by states that don’t currently have the authority to recover costs in enabling language of the compact; and
4. establishing a "compact evaluation initiative."

ANA (http://www.nursingworld.org/gova/state.htm#interstate) and NCSBN (http://www.ncsbn.org/files/msrtf.html) have websites with additional information related to multistate licensure.

All of the original documents can be accessed at this website by clicking on the name of the document, so that the reader can make a personal judgment about policy and legislative issues. It should be apparent that there is a wide diversity of opinion about the Nurse Licensure Compact within nursing. Equally important to recognize is that the lack of unity within nursing has been shared with policy makers. Although all nurses will never agree on everything related to compact language, it would be in the best interest of nursing for nurses to work out their differences privately and then present policymakers with a unified plan.

THE AUTHOR

Greer Glazer, PhD, RN, FAAN

Director, Parent Child Nursing
College of Nursing
Kent State University
Kent, OH 44202

Sign up for our e-mail notification list and we'll let you know when new issues or other information are posted on the Online Journal.

Submit Letters to the Editor   |  View Letters to the Editor  |  Related Articles NursingWorld Home   |  Front Page