FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE/September 6, 1996
CONTACT: Sara Foer [202-651-7023]
American Nurses Association Commends President Clinton's Focus on
Quality Health Care
ANA is Seen as Key Force in the Establishment of New Federal Commission
WASHINGTON, DC--The American Nurses Association (ANA) applauded President
Clinton's announcement of a National Commission on Health Care Quality, whose
purpose is to protect consumers against changes in the health care system that may
jeopardize the quality of their care. The Commission will also investigate ways of
guaranteeing high-quality care for consumers.
According to White House officials, the Commission was developed in part as a
result of ANA's strong stand and public efforts on the issue of preserving the safety and
quality of care for all patients and consumers.
In a September 6 letter to President Clinton, ANA President Beverly Malone, PhD,
RN, FAAN, confirmed ANA's commitment to this endeavor. "We are fully in support of
your efforts to spearhead a broad-based, national effort to make health quality a national
priority," she wrote. Malone further stated that the "announcement of a national
commission on health care quality represents a critically important step toward
identifying the impact of current changes in health care financing and delivery on patient
safety and quality of care."
Creation of the Commission was spurred in large part by recent public unrest
surrounding certain health care practices, such as discharging new mothers anywhere
from 8 to 24 hours after delivery and forbidding health care providers from revealing to
patients financial incentives their health plan might have for denying care.
Speaking to an audience of senior citizens and members of the Florida Nurses
Association in Sunrise, Fla., yesterday, Clinton said, "What we are trying to do is to
understand how these changes in the health care system are going to affect America's
families all generations of families: yours, mine, everyone else's." "What are the
financial implications, what are the health care implications, what else should we do? But
I am confident that being for a consumer's right to know is the right thing to do here," he
continued.
Focusing on some of the same issues that are integral components of ANA's quality
endeavors, the Commission will study and, where appropriate, develop recommendations
for the President on: 1) consumer protection; 2) quality measures; and, 3) access and
availability of treatment and services, especially to the underserved, in a rapidly changing
health care system. According to the White House, the Commission expects to submit a
preliminary report by September 30, 1997 and a final report 18 months after its first
meeting.
Under the auspices of Vice President Gore's Reinventing Government Program, the
Commission will be co-chaired by the Secretary of Health and Human Services, Donna
E. Shalala, and the Secretary of Labor, Robert B. Reich, and will consist of 20
appointments -- 10 health care providers and 10 consumers. ANA has been requested to
submit names of potential appointees to the White House by mid-September.
ANA shares President Clinton's enthusiasm not only about the Commission, but also
about two bills geared to protecting the consumer and ensuring quality health care. In her
letter to President Clinton, Malone in particular praised Clinton's "clear and outspoken
support for current legislative efforts to eliminate arbitrarily shortened maternity
hospitalizations and to end the use of gag' rules that prevent nurses, physicians, and
other professionals from speaking freely with their patients regarding treatment options.
As you know, ANA has worked with other provider and consumer groups to achieve
passage of these patient protection measures, and we deeply appreciate your support."
Highlighting the "Newborns and Mothers Health Protection Act," which calls for
appropriate lengths of stay for mothers and newborns, Clinton said, "We strongly
supported a bill that says that you cannot kick a mother and her newborn child out of a
hospital sooner than 48 hours. ...It ought to be a decision that [is made] based on what is
best for the mother and the baby..."
Similarly, in a position statement released in February, ANA called for a standard of
care that includes length of hospitalization based on the mother's and infant's needs and a
provision for postpartum home nursing care. ANA supports legislation that would ensure
ample opportunities for health care providers, in particular nurses, to observe and assess a
mother and her newborn, to provide adequate teaching and to ensure that the mother has
learned needed skills for caring for her new baby.
The other legislation, the Patient Right to Know Act, sponsored by Rep. Ed Markey
(D-MA) and Rep. Greg Ganske (R-IA), would prohibit managed care organizations from
limiting practitioners' abilities to discuss with patients the full range of treatment
options..."
ANA has long been opposed to "gag" rules and has recognized that patients need full
knowledge of their treatment options in order to make informed decisions about their
care. The ANA House of Delegates (HOD), at its meeting this summer, declared its
opposition to the use of "gag" rules, and ANA has been working on Capitol Hill with a
broad range of other consumer advocates and practitioner groups to oppose the use of
such "gag" rules.
Health care professionals "must not face discrimination when they uphold their oath
to give patients the best care," Clinton said. "Patients should feel safe in the knowledge
that they have been given the full story of what all their treatment options are and what
are best for them."
Earlier this year, ANA drew attention to the issue of safe, quality care and
consumers' rights to know through the results of a consumer survey, "Nursing and the
Quality of Patient Care," in which respondents indicated that they are worried about
many of the changes in our health care delivery system and how they affect the quality of
patient care in health care institutions. As many as three-quarters of the adults polled
indicated serious concern that the quality of patient care is being diminished by some
cost-cutting practices -- a concern that has increased significantly since 1994.
For example, whereas 67% of respondents in 1994 rated the reduction in RN staffing
as a key factor leading to deterioration of the quality of patient care in hospitals, that
percentage rose to 75% in 1996. In addition, in 1996 75% of the survey respondents
believed that reducing the number of registered nurses who provide bedside patient care
in hospitals lowers the quality of care, and 67% said that increasing the use of unlicensed
health care workers for care traditionally performed by RNs has the same
quality-diminishing effect.
The creation of the Commission and its goal to preserve and protect quality health
care builds on one of ANA's key issues of which the consumer survey played a key role.
Over the past two years, ANA has mounted a highly effective public education campaign,
"Every Patient Deserves a Nurse" to increase awareness of the growing trend of reduced
registered nurse staffing in hospitals and its impact on the safety and quality of care. The
campaign has resulted in sustained, high-profile coverage by print, wire and broadcast
media, and stimulated support and grass-roots initiatives by state nurses associations and
consumer coalitions. Federal and state legislation have been introduced to call for
consumer access to information about nurse staffing and patient outcomes as well as to
provide "whistle blower" protections for nurses who speak out publicly about patient care
issues. In addition, ANA has spearheaded the development of nursing "report card"
efforts, which would identify and promote the use of nursing quality indicators to
measure and monitor the quality of health care.
Return to the 1996 press
releases page.
Return to the 1997 press
releases page.
Return to the News Kiosk page.
| Sitemap
| Home
| Feedback
| Membership |
|